FREQUENCY OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SUPRATENTORIAL TUMOR SURGERY IN A TERTIARY CARE NEUROSURGICAL UNIT

Authors

  • Pir Tufail Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3818-5510
  • Sohrab Khan Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar
  • Ihsan Ullah Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70520/kjms.v18i2.675

Keywords:

Brain Tumor, CSF Leak, Supratentorial Tumor Surgery, Wound Infection

Abstract

Objective: To determine the frequency of postoperative complications, specifically wound infection and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, in patients undergoing supratentorial tumor surgery.

Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in the Neurosurgery Unit of MTI-Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from December 31, 2019, to June 30, 2020. A total of 73 patients diagnosed with supratentorial tumors were included using non-probability consecutive sampling. Data regarding demographic characteristics and postoperative complications were recorded on a structured proforma and analyzed using SPSS version 23.

Results: Out of 73 patients, 42 (57.5%) were male and 31 (42.5%) were female. The mean age was 35.73 ± 8.08 years. Postoperative wound infection was observed in 3 (4.1%) patients, while CSF leak occurred in another 3 (4.1%) patients.

Conclusions: Supratentorial tumor surgeries carry a risk of postoperative complications such as wound infection and CSF leak. Adequate intraoperative precautions and adherence to standard protocols are essential to minimize these risks.

Author Biographies

Pir Tufail, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

Specialist Registrar, MTI-HMC Peshawar

Sohrab Khan, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

Senior Registrar, Muhammad Teaching Hospital, Peshawar

References

1. Alsharbaini R, Almaramhy H. Snodgrass urethroplasty for hypospadias repair: A retrospective comparison of two variations of technique. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2014;9(1):69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2013.11.003

2. Gundeti MS, Large MC. Reconstruction of urogenital defects: congenital. In: Neligan PC, Gutner GC, editors. Plastic Surgery. 3rd ed. London: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. [No DOI available]

3. Duckett JW. Hypospadias. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, editors. Campbell’s Urology. 7th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1998:2093–119. [No DOI available]

4. Appeadu-Mensah W, Hesse AA, Glover-Addy H, Osei-Nketiah S, Etwire V, Sarpong PA. Complications of hypospadias surgery: Experience in a tertiary hospital of a developing country. Afr J Paediatr Surg. 2015;12(4):211–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.172538

5. Shuzhu C, Min W, Yidong L, Weijing Y. Selecting the right method for hypospadias repair to achieve optimal results for the primary situation. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1624. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3314-y

6. Bhat A, Mandal AK. Acute postoperative complications of hypospadias repair. Indian J Urol. 2008;24(2):241–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.40618

7. Dodson JL, Baird AD, Baker LA, Docimo SG, Mathews RI. Outcomes of delayed hypospadias repair: implications for decision making. J Urol. 2007;178(1):278–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.036

8. Snodgrass W, Bush N. TIP hypospadias repair: A pediatric urology indicator operation. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12(1):11–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.11.012

9. Shimotakahara A, Nakazawa N, Wada A, Nagata S, Koga H, Takahashi T, et al. Tubularized incise plate urethroplasty with dorsal inlay graft prevents meatal/neourethral stenosis: a single surgeon experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(12):2370–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.09.022

10. Ahmed M, Alsaid A. Is combined inner preputial inlay graft with tubulerized incised plate in hypospadias repair worth doing? J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(4):229.e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.020

11. The Brief Case: Central Nervous System Sparganosis in a 53-Year-Old Thai Man. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(10):2986–9. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00817-17

12. The Brief Case: Angiostrongylus cantonensis Eosinophilic Meningitis in a Returned Traveler. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55(3):867–70. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02238-16.

13. Zhu X, Kwon CH, Schaller A, et al. Glypican 1 Stimulates S Phase Entry and DNA Replication in Human Glioma Cells and Normal Astrocytes. Mol Cell Biol. 2013;33(9):1522–33. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01423-12

14. Maniakas A, Desrosiers M. Chronic Invasive Aspergillus Sinusitis and Otitis with Meningeal Extension Successfully Treated with Voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(10):7010–2. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00945-15

15. Gray WL, Mahalingam R, Baird NL, et al. Genomic Characterization of Japanese Macaque Rhadinovirus, a Novel Herpesvirus. J Virol. 2013;87(9):4716–27. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.03269-12

16. Hochmair MJ, Morabito A, Hao D, et al. Sequential afatinib and osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC: final analysis of the GioTag study. Future Oncol. 2020;16(11):2799–808. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2020-0282

17. Greenberg MS. Astrocytoma. In: Handbook of Neurosurgery. 8th ed. New York: Thieme Publishers; 2016. [No DOI available]

18. Sathornsumetee S, Rich JN, Reardon DA. Diagnosis and treatment of high-grade astrocytoma. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(4):1111–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.006

19. Furnari FB, Fenton T, Bachoo RM, et al. Malignant astrocytic glioma: genetics, biology, and paths to treatment. Genes Dev. 2007;21(21):2683–710. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1596707

20. Walker MD. Adjuvant therapy for brain tumor. Int Adv Surg Oncol. 1980;3:351–69. [No DOI available]

21. Recinos PF, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI. Brainstem tumors: where are we today? Pediatr Neurosurg. 2007;43(3):192–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000103125

22. Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1

23. Kesari S. Understanding glioblastoma tumor biology: the potential to improve current diagnosis and treatments. Semin Oncol. 2011;38 Suppl 4:S2–10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2011.09.001

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

1.
Tufail P, Khan S, Ullah I. FREQUENCY OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS FOLLOWING SUPRATENTORIAL TUMOR SURGERY IN A TERTIARY CARE NEUROSURGICAL UNIT. KJMS [Internet]. 2025 Jun. 30 [cited 2026 Jan. 27];18(2):165-9. Available from: https://kjms.com.pk/index.php/kjms/article/view/675

Issue

Section

Original Article

Most read articles by the same author(s)